What are the common mistakes made related to the writing process of a manuscript? With the latter approach, the target is rapidly attained. Presenting new results; such data belong in the results section. Therefore, during construction of a draft, attention distracting environment should be avoided, and this step should be completed within 1—2 hours.
What would it look like?
In view of the potential problems associated with medication, the results of this study support the view that young people with OCD should, therefore, be offered CBT as the firstline treatment by child and adolescent mental health services.
Besides, talents, skills, and experiences of the researchers in different fields ie. Well, the best way to start in my view is just to write, but perhaps start to write without the specific purpose of the discussion chapter in mind.
Look toward the future. Explain the limitations of the work: Each paragraph should contain opinions in favour or against the topic discussed, critical evaluations, and learning points.
Presentation of findings The research should be clearly contextualised. In a conventional thesis, what we call the IMRAD type introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion the discussion chapter appears a discrete chapter. During writing process, this abstract might be a useful guide which prevents deviation from the main objective of the manuscript.
Then, launch into "bigger picture" issues. This can feel risky because, if you have been approaching the thesis in the right spirit, you are likely to be experiencing Doubt. Other trials of CBT with young people have tended to concentrate on managing the anxiety or discomfort experienced when undertaking exposure and response prevention, e.
I remember struggling with this section myself and, looking back, I believe there were two sources of anxiety. We found that average daily IM use was negatively related to performance on the reading comprehension test, indicating that expertise did not help participants successfully complete the task.
During writing process of the manuscript one of these can be selected based on the intensity of the discussion. That includes avoiding language that implies causality when your study can only make relational conclusions.
Overall, the results of this study support the need for a large-scale randomized controlled trial. Although the scale of the current situation poses challenges to both service providers and veterans, it also presents unprecedented opportunities for scientific investigation and the continued development of evidence-based interventions for PTSD.
External referees are our colleagues who did not contribute to data collection of our study in any way, but we can request their opinions about the subject matter of the manuscript. What should be the strategy of sparing time for manuscript writing be?
Otherwise pre-peer review process can delay publication of the manuscript, and decrease motivation of the authors. For the placement of references use of software programs detailed in other sections is a rational approach. An ethnographer might devote a chapter to each theory they have built from observation.
Restating the results without interpretation or links to other research. Most of the rest of the thesis asks us to think analytically; or, if you are in a practice based discipline, to make stuff; or perhaps, if you are an ethnographer, to observe the world in some way.
Results can take the form of data, hypotheses, models, definitions, formulas, etc. Abstract Writing manuscripts to describe study outcomes, although not easy, is the main task of an academician.
Previously, similar articles might have been published, however innovative messages, and new perspectives on the relevant subject will facilitate acceptance of the article for publication.
However summarizing the basic findings of the experimental studies in the first paragraph is generally recommended by the editors of the journal. It is advisable to work on a manuscript regularly to avoid losing familiarity with the article.
Other erroneous issues consist of superfluousness of the manuscript with unnecessary repetitions, undue, and recurrent references to the problems adressed in the manuscript or their solution methods, overcriticizing or overpraising other studies, and use of a pompous literary language overlooking the main objective of sharing information.
Failing to differentiate between strong and weak results as you make conclusions about them. Fitness for purpose Are the methods of the research appropriate to the nature of the question s being asked, i. How do you find the balance?
General principles of good practice for all research will also apply.The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section.
In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics.
That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that. • Discussion: re-visits issues raised earlier in light of data. • Optional short conclusion.
Title and Abstract • Draft a title that sums up what the paper is about, using key words if possible: ‘Health, ethics and environment: a qualitative study of vegetarian motivations’. Qualitative Methods ensure that the reader has enough context to understand the results [and, later, how you interpreted the results in the discussion section of your paper].
Bavdekar, Sandeep B. and Sneha Chandak. if you are inexperienced writing research papers, consider creating two distinct sections for each element in your paper as.
Before you worry about the discussion chapter too much, consider whether you need to treat the discussion as a separate section at all. You need to keep in mind that the IMRAD structure is best used to write up empirical research work (the type where you collect data of. You've conducted your research, analyzed your findings and written your results.
You're tired and the last thing you want to do is keep writing. Yet, arguably the most difficult part of writing your dissertation awaits: your discussion, the place where you sew up the various threads of your research. Things to Avoid When Writing the Discussion Overinterpretation of the Results Summary Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a research paper.
There are elements of the discussion that should be included and other things that should be How to Write an Effective Discussion.Download